July 1, 2022

Analysis: Supreme Court declines to overturn ACA — again

The Supreme Court on Thursday turned back its third chance to upend the Affordable Care Act, rejecting a lawsuit filed by a group of Republican state attorneys general claiming that a change made by Congress in 2017 had rendered the entire law unconstitutional.

By a vote of 7-2, however, the justices did not even reach the merits of the case, ruling instead that the suing states and their individual plaintiffs, two self-employed Texans, lacked “standing” to bring the case to court.

“We proceed no further than standing,” wrote Justice Stephen Breyer for the majority. “Neither the individual nor the state plaintiffs have shown that the injury they will suffer or have suffered is ‘fairly traceable’ to the ‘allegedly unlawful conduct’ of which they complain.”

The ruling represented a win not only for backers of the health law in general, but also for Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra. As California attorney general, Becerra led the Democratic states defending the ACA after the Trump administration sided with the Republican states’ suit.

It was the third time in nine years the court has been offered the opportunity to effectively end the health law — and the third time it has refused.

The case, California v. Texas, arose as a result of a provision of the tax-cut bill passed by the Republican-controlled Congress in 2017. As part of that bill, Congress reduced to zero the ACA’s penalty for not having health insurance. The requirement for coverage, often referred to as an individual mandate, was inserted into the law to give insurers a wide pool of customers since they were now required to cover people with medical conditions. Republicans have long assailed the provision as an overreach by government.

The Republican state attorneys general argued in their suit that it was only the existence of that penalty — which the justices considered a tax — that allowed the high court to rule the law constitutional in 2012. Without the tax, the Republicans argued, not only is the mandate to have coverage unconstitutional, but the rest of the law must fall, too.

At oral arguments in the case last November, several of the conservative justices made clear they were not buying what the Republicans were selling.

On the standing issue, Chief Justice John Roberts asked whether someone would be able to sue to overturn a law requiring homeowners to mow their lawns — even if that law had no penalty. His clear suggestion was that such a person would have no case.

At issue also was the question of whether the rest of the law could stand if the justices believed that those bringing the case did have standing and if the requirement to have health insurance was unconstitutional. Even some of the court’s most conservative members, including Justice Brett Kavanaugh, suggested Congress did not intend for the rest of the law to fall if the individual mandate were declared unconstitutional.

The law, enacted in 2010, has provided coverage for about 31 million Americans. But hundreds of millions more have had their health care and coverage affected by provisions as wide-ranging as changes in Medicare drug copayments, requirements for calorie counts on menus, a pathway for approval of generic copies of expensive biologic drugs and, perhaps most important politically, protections for people with preexisting conditions and a ban on lifetime caps on coverage.

The Trump administration took several positions on the case. At one point it asserted that eliminating the tax required the entire law to be declared void and at another time suggested that the health law could be invalided only in the Republican-controlled states involved in the suit.

Before the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg last September, most court observers thought the case was highly unlikely to result in the entire ACA being struck down. That’s because Roberts voted to uphold the law in 2012, and again when it was challenged in a less sweeping way in 2015. But conservative jurist Amy Coney Barrett replaced Ginsburg, and a majority to sustain the law was considered less secure.

in Health
Related Posts

In mental health crises, a 911 call now brings a mixed team of helpers — and maybe no cops

June 14, 2021

June 14, 2021

By the time Kiki Radermacher, a mental health therapist, arrived at a Missoula, Montana, home on an emergency 911 call...

US sends Taiwan 2.5 million vaccine doses, tripling pledge

June 20, 2021

June 20, 2021

TAIPEI, Taiwan — The U.S. sent 2.5 million doses of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine to Taiwan on Sunday, tripling an...

WATCH LIVE: Senate Appropriations Committee holds hearing on CDC Budget

May 19, 2021

May 19, 2021

The Senate Committee on Appropriations will hold a hearing on Wednesday to discuss the budget for the Centers for Disease...

California to drop social distancing requirements in June

May 21, 2021

May 21, 2021

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California no longer will require social distancing and will allow full capacity for businesses when the...

Biden administration reassessing part of Georgia health plan

June 4, 2021

June 4, 2021

ATLANTA (AP) — The Biden administration is reevaluating a plan by Georgia officials to overhaul how state residents buy health...

Tens of thousands protest Belgium’s tighter COVID-19 rules

November 21, 2021

November 21, 2021

BRUSSELS — Ten of thousands of people demonstrated through central Brussels on Sunday to protest reinforced COVID-19 restrictions imposed by...

Watchdog says almost 900 Secret Service employees were infected with COVID

June 22, 2021

June 22, 2021

WASHINGTON (AP) — Roughly 900 U.S. Secret Service employees tested positive for the coronavirus, according to government records obtained by...

Dr. Fauci on Delta variant, booster shots and masks for the vaccinated

June 29, 2021

June 29, 2021

Anthony Fauci: Well, it certainly is a game changer, Judy, for people who are not vaccinated. One of the issues...

Spears set to make rare remarks to conservatorship judge

June 23, 2021

June 23, 2021

LOS ANGELES — In the most anticipated hearing in the case in years, Britney Spears is expected to address a...

WATCH LIVE: Collins, Fauci testify on 2022 NIH budget request

May 25, 2021

May 25, 2021

U.S. health officials including Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health, and Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of...

California fully reopens after being 1st to shut in pandemic

June 15, 2021

June 15, 2021

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — California, the first state in America to put in place a coronavirus lockdown, has turned a...

WATCH LIVE: Health care leaders testify on workforce shortage

May 20, 2021

May 20, 2021

The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee will hold a hearing Thursday on addressing workforce shortages in the health...

A mix-and-match approach to COVID-19 vaccines could provide logistical and immunological benefits

June 21, 2021

June 21, 2021

While it’s now pretty easy to get a COVID-19 shot in most places in the U.S., the vaccine rollout in...

In Louisiana, government skepticism is hurting vaccination rates. Will incentives help?

June 17, 2021

June 17, 2021

Dr. Joseph Kanter, Louisiana State Health Officer: Thanks, William. It’s really nice to be with you. Look, it really does...

India battles fatal fungal threat as virus deaths near 300K

May 23, 2021

May 23, 2021

NEW DELHI — Doctors in India are fighting a fatal fungal infection affecting COVID-19 patients or those who have recovered...