December 6, 2022

Oil Giants Are Dealt Major Defeats on Climate-Change as Pressures Intensify

Exxon

XOM 1.17%

Mobil Corp. and Royal Dutch

Shell

RDS.A 0.38%

PLC suffered significant defeats Wednesday as environmental groups and activist investors step up pressure on the oil industry to address concerns about climate change.

The back-to-back, watershed decisions demonstrated how dramatically the landscape is shifting for oil-and-gas companies as they face increasing pressure from environmentalists, investors, lenders, politicians and regulators to transition to cleaner forms of energy.

“The events of today show definitively that many leaders in the oil-and-gas industry have a tin ear and do not understand that society’s views and the legal and political environment in which they operate are changing radically,” said

Amy Myers Jaffe,

a professor at Tufts University’s Fletcher School who has advised energy companies.

Climate-change activists celebrated after a district court in The Hague ruled that Royal Dutch Shell has to reduce its emissions by 45% by 2030.



Photo:

remko de waal/Agence France-Presse/Getty Images

Many oil companies have begun adopting comprehensive plans to reduce emissions, and some, especially in Europe, have diversified into renewable energy. But reducing emissions without sacrificing some returns is proving challenging, and many face skepticism about their strategies.

“It’s a real market predicament,” said Peter Bryant, a managing partner at business consultant Clareo. “Even if their plan is sound, it doesn’t matter right now.”

The Shell ruling, issued by the district court in The Hague, found that Shell must curb its carbon emissions by 45% by 2030 compared with 2019 levels—and that the company was responsible not only for lowering its own direct emissions from drilling and other operations, but also those of the oil, gas and fuels eventually burned by consumers.

The target is in line with United Nations guidance for member states aimed at preventing global temperatures rising more than 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels. Under the 2015 Paris climate accord, which the U.S. rejoined earlier this year, governments agreed to limit global temperature increases to 2 degrees Celsius, and preferably to 1.5 degrees.

“This judgment will not only send shivers down the collective spines of the oil industry, but of all the other industries that significantly contribute to the greenhouse gases,” said Martyn Day, a lawyer at Leigh Day, a London-based law firm that has been involved in other pollution cases against Shell.

Lawyers and consultants said the ruling could set a precedent in other Western jurisdictions, particularly in Europe, opening oil companies to new legal jeopardy over their carbon emissions. Companies in other heavy polluting industries could also face greater environmental scrutiny, they added.

“This case does open the door for challenges to other energy-intensive sectors,” said Liz Hypes, an analyst at risk consultancy Verisk Maplecroft. Other industries that could face lawsuits include agriculture, transport and mining, all of which are already being targeted by regulators and civil society over their emissions, Ms. Hypes added.

The civil suit against Shell was led by the Dutch arm of Friends of the Earth, an environmental organization. It alleged Shell’s production of oil and natural gas contributed to climate change, violating a so-called duty of care to those affected by it and failing to meet the company’s human-rights obligations.

The activists brought the case in The Hague because that is home to one of Shell’s dual headquarters. Rather than seek damages, they asked the court to force Shell to reduce its carbon emissions. Shell’s current emissions-reduction targets are based on intensity—the amount of carbon in any unit of energy—which means it could still see its overall emissions rise.

The court said that Shell wasn’t in breach of its obligation to reduce carbon emissions but there was an “imminent breach,” and it therefore set the reduction requirement. It didn’t stipulate how the reductions should be achieved, or how it might monitor or enforce its ruling.

The Dutch court found Shell responsible not only for its own direct emissions but also for those of consumers burning fossil fuels; a man in Tianjin, China, charged an electric car in 2018.



Photo:

VCG via Getty Images

Exxon’s loss came at the hands of Engine No. 1, an upstart hedge fund owning only about 0.02% of the oil giant’s stock. It had waged an aggressive campaign challenging the company’s energy transition strategy and response to climate change, depicting it as a corporate dinosaur.

The vote at the company’s annual meeting capped a pitched, monthslong battle between the company and the activist to persuade Exxon shareholders, that turned into one of the most expensive proxy fights ever.

Engine No. 1 called for Exxon to gradually diversify its investments to be ready for a world that will need fewer fossil fuels in coming decades. Exxon defended its strategy to expand drilling, saying demand for fuels and plastics will remain strong for years to come, and pointed to a new carbon capture and storage business unit as evidence it is taking climate change seriously.

The Texas oil giant said Wednesday that a preliminary vote count showed shareholders backed at least two of Engine No. 1’s four nominees, with some votes untallied and the final outcome of several seats on the 12-member board still unclear.

Exxon Chief Executive

Darren Woods

personally campaigned against Engine No. 1. Many viewed the vote as a referendum on Mr. Woods’s performance.

Exxon lost a record $22 billion last year and was struggling to regain its status as an industry-leading profit engine, even before the coronavirus pandemic crushed global demand for oil and gas.

Both sides feverishly made their case to investors until the last minute. Exxon delayed the closing of the voting by an hour Wednesday morning, and Engine No. 1 said the company was calling investors to ask them to change their votes. In a message sent to shareholders, the fund urged them “not to fall prey to any such strategic efforts.”

“With almost 3 million shareholders, it’s not surprising we heard a wide range of views, and many supported the work that we’re doing to improve earnings and cash flow capacity, as well as the work to advance the company to a lower carbon future,” Mr. Woods said in a statement following the vote. “Today, we heard shareholders communicate a desire for Exxon Mobil to further these efforts. We’re well positioned to do that.”

Exxon Mobil was struggling to regain its footing as an industry leader even before the pandemic crushed demand for oil and gas; an Exxon oil refinery in Channahon, Ill. in September 2019.



Photo:

tannen maury/Shutterstock

The hedge fund got a big boost from some of Exxon’s largest shareholders. BlackRock Inc. backed three of Engine No. 1’s candidates, and some of the largest U.S. pension funds also supported the activist’s slate.

Asset managers are, themselves, under pressure to exert influence on their portfolio companies to do more about climate change. Many institutional investors, including BlackRock, have signed a pledge supporting goals to reach net zero carbon emissions by 2050 or sooner.

BlackRock and other asset managers have called for companies to prepare for disruptions from climate change. Critics of the world’s largest asset manager have said that BlackRock shouldn’t veer into areas that should be tackled by policy makers, but the firm’s chief executive,

Larry Fink,

has maintained that “climate risk is investment risk.”

BlackRock signaled earlier this year that it would be increasing its support for shareholder-led environmental, social and governance proposals, a move that could embolden other asset managers to take on companies.

BlackRock said in a statement that it voted for Engine No. 1’s candidates in part because it believes Exxon and its board need to further assess the possibility that demand for fossil fuels may decline rapidly in the coming decades.

“We continue to be concerned about Exxon’s strategic direction and the anticipated impact on its long-term financial performance and competitiveness,” BlackRock said.

Write to Sarah McFarlane at [email protected] and Christopher M. Matthews at [email protected]

Copyright ©2020 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Related Posts

The U.S. Travel Surge Isn’t Coming—It’s Here

May 19, 2021

May 19, 2021

The numbers do tell the story, at least for travel. A close look at the stats shows a big vaccine-fueled...

Biden Administration Extends Bipartisan Infrastructure Talks Into June

May 30, 2021

May 30, 2021

The Biden administration said Sunday that talks over a $1.7 trillion infrastructure package would need to show a “clear direction”...

U.S. Producer Prices Rose Strongly in May, Adding to Inflation Pressures

June 15, 2021

June 15, 2021

The prices that suppliers are charging businesses and other customers rose again last month, adding to inflation pressures bubbling through...

Tight Labor Market Returns the Upper Hand to American Workers

June 20, 2021

June 20, 2021

Low-wage workers found something unexpected in the economy’s recovery from the pandemic: leverage. Ballooning job openings in fields requiring minimal...

John McAfee’s Death Was Likely Suicide, Spanish Authorities Say

June 24, 2021

June 24, 2021

Spanish authorities opened an investigation into the death of software pioneer John McAfee after he was found dead in his...

U.S. Home-Price Growth Accelerated in March

May 25, 2021

May 25, 2021

Home-price growth climbed in March to the highest level in more than 15 years, as strong demand continued to outweigh...

Credit Suisse Slashes Business With SoftBank and Its Founder, Masayoshi Son

June 18, 2021

June 18, 2021

Credit Suisse CS -2.40% Group AG and SoftBank 9984 -0.80% Group Corp. Chief Executive Masayoshi Son recently dissolved a longstanding...

Biden Is Expected to Unveil $6 Trillion Spending Plan

May 28, 2021

May 28, 2021

WASHINGTON—The White House is expected to release President Biden’s first budget proposal Friday, offering new details on how the administration...

Lawsuit Accuses McDonald’s of Racially Discriminatory Ad Spending

May 21, 2021

May 21, 2021

Two companies owned by media mogul Byron Allen have filed a lawsuit against McDonald’s Corp. , accusing the fast-food giant...

Neymar Challenges Nike Over Split

May 28, 2021

May 28, 2021

Soccer superstar Neymar lashed out at Nike Inc. on Friday, questioning how the company handled a Nike employee’s allegation of...

Apple’s Annual Developer Conference Caps a Tense Year

June 7, 2021

June 7, 2021

Apple Inc.’s AAPL 1.90% annual conference for software developers begins Monday. It arrives with something unusual for the iPhone maker:...

If Economy Meets Expectations, Time to Talk Taper Approaching

May 26, 2021

May 26, 2021

The Federal Reserve’s point man on financial regulation, Randal Quarles, said Wednesday that if the U.S. economy turns in the...

10 STEPS TO BECOMING AN SEO EXPERT

July 29, 2021

July 29, 2021

Having SEO expertise is not the exclusive privilege of SEO professionals. This is a skill that can be mastered by...

Playboy Owner to Buy Lingerie Retailer Honey Birdette for Over $330 Million

June 28, 2021

June 28, 2021

Playboy on sale in France in July 2020. Photo: Raphaël Pueyo/Le Parisien/Maxppp/Zuma Press The owner of the Playboy brand is...

Hollywood’s Summer Blockbuster Season Comes With a Side of Studio Angst

May 22, 2021

May 22, 2021

LOS ANGELES—At a multiplex on Wednesday, Arnold Schwarzenegger led a pep rally for big-screen films ahead of the summer movie...